Q & A of the Catholic Faith: “Why Jesus Called Mary ‘Woman’: A Biblical & Historical Defense Against Protestant Objections”

Discover the true meaning of Jesus’ use of “Woman” for Mary at Cana and Calvary—explained with Scripture, early Church Fathers, Catholic teaching, historical context, and apologetic clarity. Learn why this term is respectful, theological, and not disrespectful to Mary.

Introduction

One of the most debated verses between Catholics and many Protestants is John 2:4, where Jesus says to Mary at the Wedding at Cana:

“Woman, what concern is that to you and to me?”1

Some Protestant writers claim this shows Jesus disrespecting His mother. However, a closer look at original language, historical usage, early Christian understanding, theological symbolism, and Church teaching reveals the opposite: Jesus’ use of “Woman” is neither disrespectful nor dismissive—instead it reflects deep theological meaning and honor.

Section 1: Original Language and Cultural Context

Greek Word for “Woman”: Gýnai

The Greek word γύναι (gýnai) is a respectful formal address, similar to:
- “Madam”
- “Ma’am”
- “Lady”2

This was not rude or dismissive in 1st-century Jewish/Greco-Roman culture. It was a polite and respectful form of address.

Parallel Uses of “Woman” in John’s Gospel

Passage	Speaker	Addressee	Context	Meaning
John 2:4	Jesus	Mary	Wedding at Cana	Respectful address
John 4:21	Jesus	Samaritan woman	Teaching about true worship	Polite, not condescending
John 19:26	Jesus on the cross	Mary	Entrusting John to Mary	High respect & new motherhood

These parallels show that “Woman” is consistently respectful and sometimes theologically charged.

Section 2: Theological Significance – “Woman” as Symbol

Old Testament Background

The phrase “the woman” echoes back to:

Genesis 3:15, the proto-evangelium, where God speaks of enmity between the serpent and the woman. Mary is traditionally seen by the early Church as the New Eve who reverses Eve’s disobedience through faithful obedience.3

Theological Interpretation

By calling Mary “Woman,” Jesus is:

Honoring her dignity
Placing her within salvation history
Associating her with God’s covenant plan

Section 3: Early Christian and Patristic Testimony

The earliest Christians and Apostolic Fathers did not see Jesus’ phrase as disrespect:

Justin Martyr (c. 150 AD):
Mary’s cooperation with Jesus at Cana is a model of faith and obedience.4

Irenaeus of Lyons (c. 180 AD):
Mary is the New Eve, whose obedience contrasts Eve’s disobedience.5

St. Augustine (c. 400 AD):
The term “Woman” reveals Christ’s divine order and truth.6

These witnesses show that early Christians immediately recognized respect and reverence in Jesus’ words.

Section 4: Catholic Teaching (Catechism of the Catholic Church)

The CCC explains Mary’s role and honor:

“In a wholly singular way she cooperated by her obedience, faith, hope, and burning charity…” (CCC 964)7

and

Mary, Mother of God, is honored by the Church. (CCC 971)8

The Church clearly sees Mary as honored and authoritative, not dismissed.

Section 5: Why the Protestant Objection Doesn’t Hold

Common Protestant Claims vs Catholic Response

Protestant Objection	Catholic Response
Jesus was rude to Mary	**“Woman” was a respectful term in Greek/Aramaic
Jesus was distancing Himself from Mary	He elevated her to spiritual motherhood at Calvary
Mary had no role after Cana	Church Fathers & Tradition affirm her ongoing significance
Calling Mary “Woman” means no respect	Word usage and early interpretation show honor and theology

Infographic: Timeline of Understanding

AD 30–100 – Jesus speaks to Mary in John’s Gospel
AD 100–200 – Apostolic Fathers reference Mary’s faith9
AD 180 – Irenaeus identifies Mary as New Eve10
AD 400 – Augustine affirms theological respect11
AD 1500 onward – Reformation objections begin
Today – Continued debate with richer historical scholarship

Quote Box: Early Church Writers

“Just as Eve … became the cause of death for herself and the whole human race, so also Mary … became the cause of salvation for herself and the whole human race.”
— Irenaeus of Lyons12

“Mary’s yes at Cana is the first of Christ’s signs.”
— Justin Martyr13

Conclusion

Jesus’ use of the word “Woman” in John’s Gospel is not disrespectful. Rather, it reflects:

Respectful language in original context
Theological identity as New Eve
Honored role in salvation history
Early Christian interpretation affirming dignity

Rather than seeing Jesus as dismissive, we see a rich theological address rooted in respect, salvation history, and familial love.

Chicago-Style Footnotes

John 2:4, ESV.
Daniel B. Wallace, Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics: An Exegetical Syntax of the New Testament (Zondervan, 1996), 519–20.
Gen 3:15; Irenaeus of Lyons, Against Heresies, III.22.4.
Justin Martyr, Dialogue with Trypho, 100.
Irenaeus, Against Heresies, III.22.4.
St. Augustine, Tractates on the Gospel of John, 29.
Catechism of the Catholic Church, §964.
Catechism of the Catholic Church, §971.
See early references in the Didache and Letter of Barnabas.
Irenaeus, Against Heresies (late 2nd century).
Augustine, Tractates on the Gospel of John (early 5th century).
Irenaeus, Against Heresies, III.22.4.
Justin Martyr, Dialogue with Trypho, 100.

IF YOU ARE A DEVOTED CATHOLIC AND HAPPY TO DEFEND YOUR CATHOLIC FAITH, YOUR SUPPORT TO CONTINUE OUR MISSION TO DEFEND THE CATHOLIC FAITH, REALLY MATTERS AND WILL ALWAYS BE VALUED AND REMEMBERED!

Pages

Thursday, January 29, 2026

“Why Jesus Called Mary ‘Woman’: A Biblical & Historical Defense Against Protestant Objections”