Debunking the Claim That Richard Baxter Was a “Catholic Bishop of Canterbury”: A Historical & Biblical Apologetic Response

A thorough historical and biblical defense against the claim that Richard Baxter was a Roman Catholic bishop of Canterbury. Includes timelines, primary sources, Scripture, Church Fathers, and scholarly documentation debunking this assertion.

---

Introduction

In recent years some Protestant voices, including certain Seventh-day Adventist (SDA) apologists, have circulated the claim that Richard Baxter (1615–1691) was somehow a Roman Catholic bishop of Canterbury with strong ties to the Catholic Church. This article examines that claim closely, showing that it is historically inaccurate, theologically unfounded, and unsupported by both primary sources and the biblical witness.

This response will:

• Compare the historical record vs. the SDA/Protestant claim

• Present primary sources (Baxter’s own writings, church records, historical lists of archbishops)

• Show biblical principles regarding church authority and ministry

• Survey patristic evidence on ordination and apostolic succession

• Provide tables, timelines, and quote boxes for clarity

---

1. The Claim: What Is Being Alleged?

Some Protestants and SDA sources claim that Richard Baxter was ordained as a Catholic bishop of Canterbury and that this somehow reflects continuity with Roman Catholic authority.

Core Problems With This Claim:

• There is no historical evidence Baxter was a bishop.

• Baxter explicitly rejected Roman Catholic doctrines.

• Church records of the Archbishops of Canterbury list no such appointment.

• Baxter himself denied any episcopal (bishop) authority.

---

2. The Historical Record: What Actually Happened

Table 1 — Baxter vs. Archbishop of Canterbury (17th Century)

Date	Archbishop of Canterbury	Richard Baxter Status
1633–1645	William Laud	Baxter a young minister
1660–1677	Gilbert Sheldon	Baxter expelled from Anglican ministry
1678–1691	William Sancroft	Baxter a Nonconformist writer

📌 There is no record of Baxter ever being appointed to ANY episcopal office.¹

 

3. Who Was Richard Baxter? (Verified Summary)

• Born: November 12, 1615 (England)

• Died: December 8, 1691

• Role: English Puritan pastor, theologian, author

• Denomination: Protestant (Puritan / Nonconformist)

• Not Ordained As: Bishop or Archbishop

• Not a Member Of: Roman Catholic Church

Baxter himself wrote:

“I admire not the title of bishop, but he that is a Christian bishop must be learned, holy, wise, and patient.”²

This reflects his skepticism of hierarchical titles, not acceptance of them.

---

4. Baxter’s Position On Catholicism

Primary Source Quotes from Baxter

“I reject the Roman doctrine of transubstantiation and papal supremacy…”³
“I do not hold that the Church of Rome is the true church governed by the successors of Peter in uninterrupted succession.”⁴

These represent clear anti-Catholic stances.

---

5. Biblical and Patristic Foundations for Church Authority

Why Protestants Cannot Justify Baxter as a “Catholic Bishop”

A. Biblical Teaching on Ministry

Scripture describes the role of church leaders, but it doesn’t validate the Catholic interpretation of apostolic succession as later developed:

• Ephesians 4:11–12 — Leaders equipping the saints

• 1 Timothy 3:1–7 — Qualifications for overseers (episkopoi)

• Titus 1:5–9 — Elders and bishops are equivalent roles

None of these passages single out the Catholic episcopacy of Canterbury.

---

6. Early Church Fathers on Apostolic Ministry (Summary)

Father	On Bishops	On Succession
Ignatius of Antioch	Bishops as local leaders	Succession within local churches⁵
Irenaeus of Lyon	Importance of apostolic teaching	Not identical to Roman papacy⁶

Even the early Fathers **do not support later Catholic claims that a specific See (like Canterbury) holds apostolic authority over all.

---

7. The Misinterpretation Explained

Many Protestants misuse Baxter’s desire for ecumenical unity or charitable language toward Catholics to claim he was “Catholic-connected.”

This is a logical error:

Unity in charity doesn’t imply doctrinal agreement.

Baxter sought peace among Christians, but he did NOT endorse Roman teachings.

---

8. Timeline: Baxter’s Life & the English Church

🕰️ Infographic Placeholder: Chronological Timeline

• 1615: Baxter born

• 1630s: Ministerial training

• 1640s: Pastoral ministry in Kidderminster

• 1662: Act of Uniformity — Baxter refuses and is expelled

• 1670s: Nonconformist ministry

• 1691: Baxter dies

---

9. Summary of Evidence That Refutes the Claim

✔ No historical appointment as bishop
✔ No Catholic affiliation in Baxter’s writings
✔ Baxter rejected key Catholic doctrines
✔ Church records contradict the claim
✔ Biblical evidence does not support the claim as Protestant apologists use it

---

10. Conclusion

The claim that Richard Baxter was a Catholic bishop of Canterbury with a strong connection to the Catholic Church is unfounded historically and theologically. Baxter was a Protestant pastor and theologian who criticized Roman Catholic doctrine, was never appointed bishop, and never embraced Catholic teaching. Reliable sources from church history, Scripture, and Baxter’s own writings confirm this.

---

Footnotes (Chicago Style)

1. See historical lists of Archbishops of Canterbury such as in Fasti Ecclesiae Anglicanae; also recorded in church history texts.

2. Richard Baxter, Reliquiae Baxterianae, ed. N. H. Keeble (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), 112.

3. Richard Baxter, A Call to the Unconverted (London: 1679).

4. Baxter, Catholick Theologie (1655).

5. Ignatius of Antioch, Letter to the Smyrnaeans.

6. Irenaeus of Lyon, Against Heresies.

IF YOU ARE A DEVOTED CATHOLIC AND HAPPY TO DEFEND YOUR CATHOLIC FAITH, YOUR SUPPORT TO CONTINUE OUR MISSION TO DEFEND THE CATHOLIC FAITH, REALLY MATTERS AND WILL ALWAYS BE VALUED AND REMEMBERED! 

<== "Give as your heart leads you." (Even though this blog comes with Free Domain and Free Hosting plans, there are still costs involve to sustain it, like the reliable internet connection that comes with premium plan, so your support for this endeavor means a lot to me.  Thank you very much.  God Bless).

READ ALSO:

1. Most Protestants are claiming that their church is the true church founded by Jesus Christ. Do they have strong evidence to support their claim?
2. Why Protestants are afraid of history?
3. 🕊️ Out of the 45,000+ Christian denominations in the world today, who has the real Apostolic Succession?
4. Is the SDA the True Church? A Catholic Response to Seventh-day Adventist Claim
5. Did Marcion Compile the Bible? A Catholic Response to SDA Pastor's Claim
6. Is the Ceremonial Law of Moses Still Applicable Today? Understanding Its Purpose and Fulfillment
7. Is It Wrong to Observe Sunday Instead of Saturday as the Sabbath? Biblical and Historical Truths About Christian Worship
8. Seventh-day Adventist Pioneers on the Trinity: Unpacking the Historical Reality Behind Their Early Belief
9. "Is the Seventh-day Adventist Church the Pillar and Foundation of Truth? A Biblical and Historical Examination of 1 Timothy 3:15"
10. Is the SDA Church the True Remnant of Bible Prophecy? A Balanced Look at Scripture, History, Fathers & Scholars     
11. 🛡️ Is the Seventh-day Adventist Church the True Church Founded by Jesus Christ?